<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leonidas: On the Brink of Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecodergeek.com/post/200/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecodergeek.com/post/200</link>
	<description>A day (or more) in the life of a CS &#38; Math student...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:42:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter&#39;s Musings &#187; Backup Strategies</title>
		<link>http://thecodergeek.com/post/200/comment-page-1#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter&#39;s Musings &#187; Backup Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecodergeek.com/?p=200#comment-175</guid>
		<description>[...] program calls  The second is that it saves me a lot of time in copying the files. Similar to the DeltaRPM feature I raved about with Fedora 11, it copies over only the changed content instead of the entire directory tree. With my home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] program calls  The second is that it saves me a lot of time in copying the files. Similar to the DeltaRPM feature I raved about with Fedora 11, it copies over only the changed content instead of the entire directory tree. With my home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesD</title>
		<link>http://thecodergeek.com/post/200/comment-page-1#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecodergeek.com/?p=200#comment-164</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the useful info. It&#039;s so interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful info. It&#8217;s so interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://thecodergeek.com/post/200/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecodergeek.com/?p=200#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Well, there are bugs introduced all over the place that are still not fixed. E.g., from the 4 machines I have access to, 2 of them would have lost important hardware features like suspend-to-ram / resume, dual head, wireless, etc.

I &#039;ve been in a few test days and bugs have been filed for all of those, yet they were not fixed, some not even commented upon. Is this anybody&#039;s fault? Not really,
this is all part of how FOSS works.

I &#039;m just saying that it is not that the introduced bugs from all those new features were fixed, it is just that you don&#039;t see them ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there are bugs introduced all over the place that are still not fixed. E.g., from the 4 machines I have access to, 2 of them would have lost important hardware features like suspend-to-ram / resume, dual head, wireless, etc.</p>
<p>I &#8216;ve been in a few test days and bugs have been filed for all of those, yet they were not fixed, some not even commented upon. Is this anybody&#8217;s fault? Not really,<br />
this is all part of how FOSS works.</p>
<p>I &#8216;m just saying that it is not that the introduced bugs from all those new features were fixed, it is just that you don&#8217;t see them <img src='http://thecodergeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
